Skip to main content

Hey Rook!

Watching yesterday's painful game, one of the interesting subplots was that the two top American League Rookie of the Year candidates were playing: Sox second baseman Dustin Pedroia and Rays' rightfielder Delmon Young. Of course, I think this is a no-brainer. Pedroia is batting .325 at the top of the order of the best team in baseball. D.P. has also become a master at the D.P. and every other aspect of the defensive game. He might not have Rey Sanchez range, but he has just 5 errors and a .991 fielding percentage - amazingly, that only ties him for fourth in the league. He does rank pretty high on the subjective "zone rating" statistic which is supposed to gauge how many balls a player gets to that he should get; he's 4th in the league which isn't bad since that's supposed to be his weakness.

Anyway, that's not why I'm writing. I was just caught up in the fun of those sortable fielding stats. What does that say about me? Never mind...

What's interesting about the Delmon v. D.P. contest is that they are prototypes of two different, and seemingly contentious camps in baseball thought. The old skool types believe that it's essential to get "tools". That is, scouts' primary goal should be to find young players with potential in all five tools - speed, power, arm, hitting for average, and fielding. Young has this and it's working. Another school of thought maintains that you look for results. If a player has a funky motion but always gets outs (Chad Bradford), then it's reasonable to expect him to continue to get outs. If he has Molina-brother-speed but hits .400 at every level, he'll continue to hit (Youk). Pedroia is this guy. He has always been underestimated because of his size and lack of speed. Yet, he has been a force everywhere he's played.

Part of this is also what I'll call a contrast in rawness. Young strikes out a lot (on pace for 128 this season) and never walks (on pace for 26) while D.P. is one of the hardest people to strike out and walks quite a lot - he's 5th in the AL in walks per strikeout (1.13) while Young is 164th in the majors at 0.24 (5th from the worst).

I'm putting this out there more for debate then to judge who's better. In my opinion, I'd take Pedroia over Young right now. But, the "ceiling" is still a relevant subject for player analysis and Young's is cathedral-esque. He's nasty and he could be one of the great players of his generation, in the scary Vlad Guererro mold. Lastly, these can both be correct ways to analyze players; they don't have to be mutually exclusive. Prof. Gammons has noted that some old school people might not support D.P. for R.O.Y. because they still don't believe he's very good and somehow begrudge him as a product of the new wave in baseball thought. That's a terrible reason not to vote for him.

Note: funny how no one seems to mention Young's mountain-dew-level-extreme past or even is pedigree: his brother Dimitri continues a pretty solid major league career.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Hanley Exits Stage Right

Hanley Ramirez has been released by the Red Sox.  With Pedey coming back, this had occurred to me as an option but a very unlikely one.  It seemed like having three catchers was a luxury they couldn't afford, or they'd send Brock Holt down temporarily or put Nunez on the DL just because he really is always injured so why not.

In the end though, they realized keeping Hanley didn't make sense.  If he came out of his slump, you're likely going to get stuck with him for next year or have a conflict with him and the fans when you bench a productive player.  But it was more likely he'd have good moments but never be all that good.  He's been terrible for about 3 weeks now.  Cutting bait with Hanley means you have more money for next year (Kimbrel & Mookie perhaps), you don't have the headache of however he's going to act if/when you bench him, and you keep other options on your roster.  As for the money, you're already spending it either way so don…

JD Martinez and Red Sox Depth

The Sox have signed JD Martinez; so, that's good.  His track record, personal reports on work ethic and attitude (aka lessons learns from Panda mania), and the fact that he's seen most of his success in the American League point to this being as sure a success as you can have in free agency.  He is getting a hefty pay check while the Sox aren't locked down for 6, 7 or Hosmer years.

Taking as a given that Martinez will be an outstanding hitter in the middle of the lineup, this signing - along with the signing of Eduardo Nunez earlier in the weekend - gives this Red Sox offense the most depth they have had since the 2013 champions.  That team taught us that it makes good baseball sense to go a few players deep at each position if you can, and to not obsess with how you'll find at bats for everyone.  Here we go again with that approach.

The 2018 Red Sox are remarkably deep and flexible.  When someone gets hurt, the likelihood is that that player will be replaced in the l…

Opening Day & Possible Unlikely 2018 Contributors & Breakthroughs

It's opening day and the Sox are playing the Rays.  While the beauty of baseball is that any team can beat any other team on any given day, the Sox should - and need to - dominate the Rays this season.  The Rays are going to try a 4 man rotation (a very good idea btw with the way the game is trending) - but then they lost one of those four.  Rumor is that they are close to signing Charlie Hough.  Their best player is Kevin Kiermaier whose very solid, but essentially their best player is Jackie Bradley, Jr.  Even if Wilson Ramos returns to All Star form and C.J. Cron finally becomes decent, this will be a pretty bad team.  They'll get a jolt when star SS prospect Willy Adames arrives but otherwise the Sox need to feast on the Rays this year if they hope to win the division.

The Sox opening day lineup meanwhile has a couple of sorta-surprises from where we started spring.  Hanley is starting at 1B over Mitch Moreland despite a righty starter, and Christian Vazquez is catching Chr…