Skip to main content

Hey Rook!

Watching yesterday's painful game, one of the interesting subplots was that the two top American League Rookie of the Year candidates were playing: Sox second baseman Dustin Pedroia and Rays' rightfielder Delmon Young. Of course, I think this is a no-brainer. Pedroia is batting .325 at the top of the order of the best team in baseball. D.P. has also become a master at the D.P. and every other aspect of the defensive game. He might not have Rey Sanchez range, but he has just 5 errors and a .991 fielding percentage - amazingly, that only ties him for fourth in the league. He does rank pretty high on the subjective "zone rating" statistic which is supposed to gauge how many balls a player gets to that he should get; he's 4th in the league which isn't bad since that's supposed to be his weakness.

Anyway, that's not why I'm writing. I was just caught up in the fun of those sortable fielding stats. What does that say about me? Never mind...

What's interesting about the Delmon v. D.P. contest is that they are prototypes of two different, and seemingly contentious camps in baseball thought. The old skool types believe that it's essential to get "tools". That is, scouts' primary goal should be to find young players with potential in all five tools - speed, power, arm, hitting for average, and fielding. Young has this and it's working. Another school of thought maintains that you look for results. If a player has a funky motion but always gets outs (Chad Bradford), then it's reasonable to expect him to continue to get outs. If he has Molina-brother-speed but hits .400 at every level, he'll continue to hit (Youk). Pedroia is this guy. He has always been underestimated because of his size and lack of speed. Yet, he has been a force everywhere he's played.

Part of this is also what I'll call a contrast in rawness. Young strikes out a lot (on pace for 128 this season) and never walks (on pace for 26) while D.P. is one of the hardest people to strike out and walks quite a lot - he's 5th in the AL in walks per strikeout (1.13) while Young is 164th in the majors at 0.24 (5th from the worst).

I'm putting this out there more for debate then to judge who's better. In my opinion, I'd take Pedroia over Young right now. But, the "ceiling" is still a relevant subject for player analysis and Young's is cathedral-esque. He's nasty and he could be one of the great players of his generation, in the scary Vlad Guererro mold. Lastly, these can both be correct ways to analyze players; they don't have to be mutually exclusive. Prof. Gammons has noted that some old school people might not support D.P. for R.O.Y. because they still don't believe he's very good and somehow begrudge him as a product of the new wave in baseball thought. That's a terrible reason not to vote for him.

Note: funny how no one seems to mention Young's mountain-dew-level-extreme past or even is pedigree: his brother Dimitri continues a pretty solid major league career.


Popular posts from this blog

JD Martinez and Red Sox Depth

The Sox have signed JD Martinez; so, that's good.  His track record, personal reports on work ethic and attitude (aka lessons learns from Panda mania), and the fact that he's seen most of his success in the American League point to this being as sure a success as you can have in free agency.  He is getting a hefty pay check while the Sox aren't locked down for 6, 7 or Hosmer years.

Taking as a given that Martinez will be an outstanding hitter in the middle of the lineup, this signing - along with the signing of Eduardo Nunez earlier in the weekend - gives this Red Sox offense the most depth they have had since the 2013 champions.  That team taught us that it makes good baseball sense to go a few players deep at each position if you can, and to not obsess with how you'll find at bats for everyone.  Here we go again with that approach.

The 2018 Red Sox are remarkably deep and flexible.  When someone gets hurt, the likelihood is that that player will be replaced in the l…

The 2018 Red Sox Biggest Liability: Infield Defense

This Red Sox team is stacked.  At the moment, the biggest concerns seems to be the Mookie Betts hasn't been hitting and the fifth starter is likely going to be the perfectly capable Brian Johnson or Hector Vazquez for the first month or so.  But this team does have one real problem with it - and another possible one I'll write about later.  The infield defense has the potential to be pretty bad.  Given that I'm usually the one seeing hope in dark Sox times, I figured I'd try to dampen everyone's spirits now that we're cloaked in the warm glow of J.D. Martinez in a Red Sox uniform.

Based on what new manager Alex Cora has said so far, the Red Sox most likely Opening Day infield will be Hanley Ramirez at first, Eduardo Nunez at second, Bogaerts at short, and Devers at third.  That's a group that has the potential to really hit, but they also all have big defensive question marks.  It's not great when Bogaerts is your best defensive infield starter.  For the…

Sox Season Preview

Starting strong isn't a necessity for making a championship run but it sure helps.  Unfortunately, these Sox will need some real luck to get off to a great start.  They're starting off the year without their #2 starter, starting their 3rd best catcher, lacking a platoon partner for either 1B or 3B, missing their two best set-up guys, and expecting All Star caliber play from a rookie.  That said, all these issues should resolve themselves by mid-June and even a bad Sox '17 team should be in fine position to make a second half run.  But Sox fans will likely be pulling out their hair for the first month or two.

Things do have a way of working themselves out with good teams.  Last year, the Sox started the year with a pronounced lack of home runs, their best pitcher was the last guy to make the rotation (Wright) and we had gone through 2 catchers and lost a live Panda.  Things turned around with the team ending up 7th in the AL in homers - and by far the most runs - the league…