Skip to main content

The Casey-Lowrie Samba

This 'ill be a short post as I'm on vacation, but I'd love some insights from my many, many... many! readers about a question my dad and I can not seem to find an answer to: why are the Sox routinely pulling Sean Casey in the ninth inning in order to play Cora at short, Lowrie at third, and Youk at first? I'm am very much open to opinions.

I don't like this move. Obviously, Youk is a fantastic first baseman. But when they pull Casey to bring in someone else, they lose a player for the rest of that game. In doing so, they get a better firstbase man, but they put a rookie shortstop (Lowrie) at third. Casey is a solid firstbaseman (if anyone can tell me which of these three ways I'm supposed to spell that word, you win a caramel, a real caramel). Why do you lose a player on your bench for the benefit of Youk over Casey at first while exchanging Youk for Lowrie at third? Not worth it to me.

Anybody? Anybody? Bueller?


Smitch said…
Well, I think that the sox clearly think they get better defensively with the swap. I think it has less to do with third base than with both first and short. You and I have had discussions about how good a shortstop Lowrie is/is considered to be, but I think the Sox think Cora is the natural, and is a definite improvement. Plus, you get Youk, who's a dynamite first baseman (the correct sp., by the way-- you can fedex that caramel to my house).

For what it's worth, based on a cursory review of fielding sabermetrics (which are admittedly imprecise) for each of these guys, Youk is by far the best fielder at his position.

Obviously, this is weighed against the downside associated with losing an extra bench player. You may be right that it's not worth the risk-- I think the Sox think that the times that even a minor step down in defensive prowess costs you a game in late innings occur far more frequently than the times not having an extra bench player costs you a game.
Doak said…
Sam's right, but I thought of all of that first, so I want the caramel.
Wally said…
Agreed, mostly. I do worry about doing this against a team with a speedster, like maybe the Anaheim Angel of California in L.A. on the West Coast's Chone Figgens. I'm not confident that Lowrie is solid enough at third to handle a tough bunt in the 9th inning of a close game from Chone. Anyway, I get your point, and I do love Cora defensively.

Popular posts from this blog

JD Martinez and Red Sox Depth

The Sox have signed JD Martinez; so, that's good.  His track record, personal reports on work ethic and attitude (aka lessons learns from Panda mania), and the fact that he's seen most of his success in the American League point to this being as sure a success as you can have in free agency.  He is getting a hefty pay check while the Sox aren't locked down for 6, 7 or Hosmer years.

Taking as a given that Martinez will be an outstanding hitter in the middle of the lineup, this signing - along with the signing of Eduardo Nunez earlier in the weekend - gives this Red Sox offense the most depth they have had since the 2013 champions.  That team taught us that it makes good baseball sense to go a few players deep at each position if you can, and to not obsess with how you'll find at bats for everyone.  Here we go again with that approach.

The 2018 Red Sox are remarkably deep and flexible.  When someone gets hurt, the likelihood is that that player will be replaced in the l…

The 2018 Red Sox Biggest Liability: Infield Defense

This Red Sox team is stacked.  At the moment, the biggest concerns seems to be the Mookie Betts hasn't been hitting and the fifth starter is likely going to be the perfectly capable Brian Johnson or Hector Vazquez for the first month or so.  But this team does have one real problem with it - and another possible one I'll write about later.  The infield defense has the potential to be pretty bad.  Given that I'm usually the one seeing hope in dark Sox times, I figured I'd try to dampen everyone's spirits now that we're cloaked in the warm glow of J.D. Martinez in a Red Sox uniform.

Based on what new manager Alex Cora has said so far, the Red Sox most likely Opening Day infield will be Hanley Ramirez at first, Eduardo Nunez at second, Bogaerts at short, and Devers at third.  That's a group that has the potential to really hit, but they also all have big defensive question marks.  It's not great when Bogaerts is your best defensive infield starter.  For the…

Sox Season Preview

Starting strong isn't a necessity for making a championship run but it sure helps.  Unfortunately, these Sox will need some real luck to get off to a great start.  They're starting off the year without their #2 starter, starting their 3rd best catcher, lacking a platoon partner for either 1B or 3B, missing their two best set-up guys, and expecting All Star caliber play from a rookie.  That said, all these issues should resolve themselves by mid-June and even a bad Sox '17 team should be in fine position to make a second half run.  But Sox fans will likely be pulling out their hair for the first month or two.

Things do have a way of working themselves out with good teams.  Last year, the Sox started the year with a pronounced lack of home runs, their best pitcher was the last guy to make the rotation (Wright) and we had gone through 2 catchers and lost a live Panda.  Things turned around with the team ending up 7th in the AL in homers - and by far the most runs - the league…