Skip to main content

Lowrie v. Lugo

I was reading an article yesterday (inexplicably archived now and unavailable after only one week) in the Boston Herald (diversity of sources folks) which contained a really interesting observation: Julio Lugo has the best on base percentage of any starting shortstop in the American League. Check it out here.

Lugo is batting .268 with a .355 OBP. Jed Lowrie is ahead of him, but he's officially (officially?) sitting for Julio - Lowrie's batting .310 with a .368 batting average. On the other hand, I don't think we can count on Lowrie to be a .310 major league 6th-spot hitter all year.

The obvious difference between the two is Lowrie's real-deal pop. Something happened to Lugo since he left Tampa Bay and he left his power in the dome. Lowrie's slugging percentage is .468 while Lugo's is a painful .330. Lowrie's 29 RBIs in less than half the plate appearances it took Lugo to get 22 is the statistical talk of the town. Lowrie hit a ball a few weeks ago against Oakland for a triple which was just crushed. With any loft that's in the stands in center, in Fenway. I have never said that about Lugo.

Additionally, Peter Gammons wrote in a recent Globe online Q&A: "one national league team that does defensive ratings like Red Sox and Indians has Lowrie's defense ranked 5th among the 62 major league shortstops. I might add that Derek Jeter and Jose Reyes were in the 40's."

At the risk of being struck by lightning because of the hubris of questioning a living god, I think Gammons and his scout buddy go a bit too far with this. My guess is that the fact that Lowrie has not made a single error in his 24 games at short really skews the statistics. Yes, he deserves a great deal of credit for not making an error, but I bet statistically he will shoot down the rankings once be breaks that seal, which he will do. Also, according to the range factor stat (which I do not trust but which I bet is in that scout's analysis), Lowrie has more range than Lugo (4.10 to 3.70). Most people seem to think Lugo has the superior range - Lowrie's liability was supposed to be his range and glove.

My point? Who says I have to have one. It's my damned blog.

I did begin thinking about this post seeking to debate what is now an arguably moot point since Lowrie's batting average has shot up. Anyway, here it is for the sake of argument: if Lowrie has more RBIs and almost no errors, but Lugo gets on base more and covers more ground, why is it that we all know we want Lowrie as the starting shortstop? The obvious answer is that his slugging is great (only behind the Royal's super-surprise Mike Aviles and J-HHonny Peralta in the AL). Any other thoughts? Can I get a saber-disciple to admit RBIs matter?

Side note: I like his holiness Peter Gammon's idea of using Lugo as a super-sub the rest of this year and even the next few years if he'll take it. The Sox have him under contract for two more years after this one. He can play every position on the field and you could do worse as a back up bat. I'm doubtful he'd take it, but I think that that versatility is the only way that the now 33 year old Lugo is still in the majors at 37.


ecl1958 said…
For some irrational reason I have a soft spot for Lugo. That said, as I do realize that Lowrie is our future, I hope Lugo WILL agree to a supersub role if that's what it comes to. I've already seen one favorite bid farewell to Fenway this season (Manny) and would hate to lose another.

Popular posts from this blog

JD Martinez and Red Sox Depth

The Sox have signed JD Martinez; so, that's good.  His track record, personal reports on work ethic and attitude (aka lessons learns from Panda mania), and the fact that he's seen most of his success in the American League point to this being as sure a success as you can have in free agency.  He is getting a hefty pay check while the Sox aren't locked down for 6, 7 or Hosmer years.

Taking as a given that Martinez will be an outstanding hitter in the middle of the lineup, this signing - along with the signing of Eduardo Nunez earlier in the weekend - gives this Red Sox offense the most depth they have had since the 2013 champions.  That team taught us that it makes good baseball sense to go a few players deep at each position if you can, and to not obsess with how you'll find at bats for everyone.  Here we go again with that approach.

The 2018 Red Sox are remarkably deep and flexible.  When someone gets hurt, the likelihood is that that player will be replaced in the l…

The 2018 Red Sox Biggest Liability: Infield Defense

This Red Sox team is stacked.  At the moment, the biggest concerns seems to be the Mookie Betts hasn't been hitting and the fifth starter is likely going to be the perfectly capable Brian Johnson or Hector Vazquez for the first month or so.  But this team does have one real problem with it - and another possible one I'll write about later.  The infield defense has the potential to be pretty bad.  Given that I'm usually the one seeing hope in dark Sox times, I figured I'd try to dampen everyone's spirits now that we're cloaked in the warm glow of J.D. Martinez in a Red Sox uniform.

Based on what new manager Alex Cora has said so far, the Red Sox most likely Opening Day infield will be Hanley Ramirez at first, Eduardo Nunez at second, Bogaerts at short, and Devers at third.  That's a group that has the potential to really hit, but they also all have big defensive question marks.  It's not great when Bogaerts is your best defensive infield starter.  For the…

Sox Season Preview

Starting strong isn't a necessity for making a championship run but it sure helps.  Unfortunately, these Sox will need some real luck to get off to a great start.  They're starting off the year without their #2 starter, starting their 3rd best catcher, lacking a platoon partner for either 1B or 3B, missing their two best set-up guys, and expecting All Star caliber play from a rookie.  That said, all these issues should resolve themselves by mid-June and even a bad Sox '17 team should be in fine position to make a second half run.  But Sox fans will likely be pulling out their hair for the first month or two.

Things do have a way of working themselves out with good teams.  Last year, the Sox started the year with a pronounced lack of home runs, their best pitcher was the last guy to make the rotation (Wright) and we had gone through 2 catchers and lost a live Panda.  Things turned around with the team ending up 7th in the AL in homers - and by far the most runs - the league…