Skip to main content


J.D Drew is making $14 million this year to hit .230 with 4 homeruns. All the while his stoicism makes him seem like he would rather be anywhere else but playing a boys game for millions of dollars every summer.

This year's minimum wage for a major leaguer is $414,o00. So, when infielder Angel Sanchez - this year's #2 hitter for the Astros (sorry Millsy) - played one game for the Sox last year he earned something like $2,500 for a day's work.

Are they worth it?

This is a question that comes up often - especially in the person on J.D. "Nancy" Drew. He's carried the team at times, usually had a very high on-base percentage, decent power numbers, wonderful defense, and played about 130-140 games in 3 of his first 4 years here. But he also gets paid a massive sum while playing a joyless - if solid - brand of baseball. He has a reputation as being soft and underachieving.

But my question has always been: why do we the fans care what the rightfielder is paid?

There's an interesting desire for a sense of fairness that raises its head in the context of "overpaid" major leaguers. We like to think a player can be worth what's he's paid. We base that analysis largely on how a player's salary compares to other players. Then we ask:

How did that player play compared to players in the same tax bracket?
Drew is the 11th highest paid outfielder in the majors. Only 3 of the players paid more than him would I actually take over him (Carl Crawford, Matt H0lliday, and Ichiro). In that context, he's no more overpaid than a number of other folks like Jason Bay and Vernon Wells.

How does he compare to his teammates?
Drew is the 4th highest paid player on the Sox (behind Beckett, Lackey and Crawford). So that means he's more valuable than Youk and Peddy!?!? For shame! However, that's a simplistic analysis. Youk and Peddy are shorter tenured and have not tested the free agent market. They - along with another of other prominent younger, homegrown Sox - decided to sign long-term deals before they hit the market. They chose security over maximum dollars. That's the anti-Drew approach. Drew is loathed in Philly for holding out for a whole year rather than sign a deal with them, then signing a big ground-breaking contract with St. Louis the next year. He's always gone for max dollars - adding to his bad reputation. Scott Boras probably has a bronzed statue of Drew in his lobby as the ideal client.

How did he live up to expectations?
Drew came to the Sox with oddly high expectations. His first 8 full season were pretty similar to his next 4 with the Sox. But he's always been a big name with a beautiful swing, tons of talent, and an aura of under-utilized talent.

So, that's part of the story of the lens through which fans see J.D. Drew's contract.

But why do we care?

J.D. Drew's contact really don't matter when it comes to whether or not the Sox win. At no point has Drew's contract really prevented the Sox' leadership from stepping up and paying for the talent they want. Just look at Crawford and Adrian Gonzalez.

Second, the money isn't really ours. Indirectly, we are the people that put in the money - in ticket sales, concessions, merchandise, etc. - that make these salaries possible. But I don't feel like I'm paying J.D. Drew.

It comes down to a sense of fairness. It's not fair that he gets paid that to be a decent player! He should at least play with the dirtdog approach of his predecessor Trot Nixon (left) or manic passion of Peddy.

The fact is the J.D. Drew was paid what the market wanted to pay him at the time. He has been a solid player until now. But he'll always be disliked in Boston - albeit slightly less than in Philly. I somehow don't expect to see Drew talking baseball in the NESN pre-game in the future. He'll fade into history unceremoniously - perhaps as soon as this winter - and Sox fan's will complain about him for years despite not really having a reason to hate him so much.


Popular posts from this blog

Hanley Exits Stage Right

Hanley Ramirez has been released by the Red Sox.  With Pedey coming back, this had occurred to me as an option but a very unlikely one.  It seemed like having three catchers was a luxury they couldn't afford, or they'd send Brock Holt down temporarily or put Nunez on the DL just because he really is always injured so why not.

In the end though, they realized keeping Hanley didn't make sense.  If he came out of his slump, you're likely going to get stuck with him for next year or have a conflict with him and the fans when you bench a productive player.  But it was more likely he'd have good moments but never be all that good.  He's been terrible for about 3 weeks now.  Cutting bait with Hanley means you have more money for next year (Kimbrel & Mookie perhaps), you don't have the headache of however he's going to act if/when you bench him, and you keep other options on your roster.  As for the money, you're already spending it either way so don…

JD Martinez and Red Sox Depth

The Sox have signed JD Martinez; so, that's good.  His track record, personal reports on work ethic and attitude (aka lessons learns from Panda mania), and the fact that he's seen most of his success in the American League point to this being as sure a success as you can have in free agency.  He is getting a hefty pay check while the Sox aren't locked down for 6, 7 or Hosmer years.

Taking as a given that Martinez will be an outstanding hitter in the middle of the lineup, this signing - along with the signing of Eduardo Nunez earlier in the weekend - gives this Red Sox offense the most depth they have had since the 2013 champions.  That team taught us that it makes good baseball sense to go a few players deep at each position if you can, and to not obsess with how you'll find at bats for everyone.  Here we go again with that approach.

The 2018 Red Sox are remarkably deep and flexible.  When someone gets hurt, the likelihood is that that player will be replaced in the l…

Opening Day & Possible Unlikely 2018 Contributors & Breakthroughs

It's opening day and the Sox are playing the Rays.  While the beauty of baseball is that any team can beat any other team on any given day, the Sox should - and need to - dominate the Rays this season.  The Rays are going to try a 4 man rotation (a very good idea btw with the way the game is trending) - but then they lost one of those four.  Rumor is that they are close to signing Charlie Hough.  Their best player is Kevin Kiermaier whose very solid, but essentially their best player is Jackie Bradley, Jr.  Even if Wilson Ramos returns to All Star form and C.J. Cron finally becomes decent, this will be a pretty bad team.  They'll get a jolt when star SS prospect Willy Adames arrives but otherwise the Sox need to feast on the Rays this year if they hope to win the division.

The Sox opening day lineup meanwhile has a couple of sorta-surprises from where we started spring.  Hanley is starting at 1B over Mitch Moreland despite a righty starter, and Christian Vazquez is catching Chr…